Prostate + Pelvic Nodes

Overview

Treating the prostate together with the pelvic lymph nodes adds a large nodal volume that runs up the pelvic side walls, usually delivered as a simultaneous integrated boost with the prostate at the highest dose. The planning problem grows accordingly: rectum and bladder still matter around the prostate, but small and large bowel now sit alongside the nodal targets.

How It Differs From Prostate-Only Treatment

Adding the pelvic lymph nodes turns a small, compact prostate plan into a large one that reaches up to the common iliac vessels. Randomized evidence such as POP-RT supports elective nodal treatment in higher-risk disease.

Most plans use a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB): several dose levels in one plan, delivered in the same number of fractions. Published protocols, for example, give three SIB schedules — 20, 25 or 39–40 fractions — with separate dose levels for the prostate and involved seminal vesicles, uninvolved seminal vesicles, involved nodes and elective nodes.

What changes for the planner:

  • Bowel becomes a main concern. Small and large bowel sit right next to the nodal volumes, so bowel limits — often on a bowel bag — can drive the plan as much as the rectum.
  • Several PTVs, several dose levels. Each target is evaluated against its own prescription, and dose has to fall off between the boost and the nodal volumes.
  • The constraints depend on the schedule. The table below has one column per schedule — use the one you are planning.

Simulation & Daily Setup

As for prostate-only treatment, with a longer scan and more attention to the bowel.

Scan range
The planning CT has to extend high enough to cover the whole nodal volume.

What is it?

A planning CT that extends high enough to cover the full nodal volume with margin.

Why does it matter?

The scan typically runs from L3/L4 to below the ischial tuberosities; the upper level may be extended when nodes are treated.

IV contrast
Contrast shows the iliac vessels that the nodal volumes are drawn around.

What is it?

Intravenous contrast at simulation to show the pelvic vessels.

Why does it matter?

Elective nodal volumes are drawn around the iliac vessels, so seeing the vessels clearly makes nodal contouring more reproducible. IV contrast is often considered for this.

Image fusion — PSMA PET and MRI
PSMA PET shows the involved nodes, which get a higher dose than elective ones; MRI is used for the prostate itself.

What is it?

Image fusion aligns an outside scan with the planning CT so the target can be drawn using information the CT doesn't show. When the pelvic nodes are treated, staging with PSMA PET/CT is recommended — it shows involved nodes and disease within the prostate. MRI is fused for the prostate and seminal vesicles, as in prostate-only treatment.

Why does it matter?

Involved nodes receive a higher dose than elective ones, so knowing exactly which are involved changes the target volumes. In a randomized trial, PSMA PET/CT found pelvic nodal or distant spread more accurately than CT and bone scan. Involved nodes are small and sit along the vessels, so check the registration at each node rather than only at the prostate.

Bladder filling
With nodes treated, a full bladder also moves small bowel away from the nodal PTV.

What is it?

A comfortably full, reproducible bladder.

Why does it matter?

With nodes in the field, bladder filling also affects how much small bowel sits in the pelvis — a fuller bladder can displace bowel upward and away from the nodal PTV.

Rectal preparation and fiducials
The prostate boost still sits against the rectum, so the prostate-only preparation still applies.

What is it?

The same measures used for prostate-only treatment. More →

Why does it matter?

The prostate boost still sits against the rectum; see the definitive page for details.

Target Delineation

What each volume represents. Nodal regions, margins and dose levels come from your protocol.

CTV prostate / seminal vesicles — High-dose boost volume

Definition

The prostate and any involved seminal vesicles, receiving the highest dose level.

Why it matters

Planned exactly as in prostate-only treatment; rectal and bladder dose around it still matter most.

Contouring resources

Organ contouring guides →

CTV uninvolved seminal vesicles — Intermediate dose level

Definition

Seminal vesicles not involved by tumor, treated to a lower dose.

Why it matters

Giving uninvolved seminal vesicles a lower dose level reduces dose to the rectum and bladder behind and below them.

Contouring resources

Organ contouring guides →

CTV involved nodes — Nodal boost

Definition

Nodes that are visibly involved, typically on PSMA PET, with a small expansion.

Why it matters

They receive a higher dose than elective nodes, which can put a high-dose region right next to bowel.

Contouring resources

Organ contouring guides →

CTV elective nodes — Pelvic nodal regions

Definition

Pelvic node regions at risk — obturator, internal, external and common iliac and presacral, depending on the protocol.

Why it matters

The nodal volume is the largest target and the one closest to bowel. Consensus atlases define which regions to include and where each one starts and stops.

Contouring resources

Organ contouring guides →

PTVs — One per dose level

Definition

An expansion of each CTV for setup and motion uncertainty.

Why it matters

The prostate moves independently of the pelvic bones and nodes. Image guidance usually matches on the prostate, so the nodal PTVs have to allow for that difference.

Contouring resources

Organ contouring guides →

Organs at Risk & Dose Constraints

Click an organ for its anatomy, why it matters and contouring resources. Superscripts link to the study behind each value.

Organ60 Gy / 20 fxNodes 44 Gy68 Gy / 25 fxNodes 45–50 Gy78–80 Gy / 39–40 fxNodes 54–60 Gy
Rectum
  • V40.8 Gy <60%1,2
  • V60 Gy <3%1,2
  • V50 Gy <35%3
  • V70 Gy <0.1%3
  • V50 Gy <50%4
  • V70 Gy <20%4
Bladder
  • V48.6 Gy <25%1,2
  • V60 Gy <5%1,2
  • V50 Gy <25%3
  • V60 Gy <15%3
  • V65 Gy <50%4,5
  • V70 Gy <35%4,5
Small Bowel25 fx values are acceptable limits; stricter ideal targets exist.—
  • Bowel bag V45 Gy <158 cc3
  • Bowel bag V60 Gy <6 cc3
  • Peritoneal cavity V45 Gy <195 cc5
Large Bowel / Sigmoid39–40 fx values are general conventional limits, not prostate-specific.—
  • V50 Gy <35%3
  • V70 Gy <0.1%3
  • V45 Gy <5% or <20 cc6
  • V35 Gy <35% or 150 cc6
Femoral Heads
  • V40.8 Gy <50%1,2
  • V50 Gy <5%3
  • V50 Gy <5%4
Penile BulbNever at the expense of PTV coverage.——
  • Mean dose <52.5 Gy5,7
  • Rectum: solid organ from the rectosigmoid junction to the bottom of the ischial tuberosities or the anal verge, whichever is shorter.
References (7)
  1. CHHiP (Dearnaley 2016) — Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 CHHiP trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(8):1047–1060 Source
  2. CHHiP PROs (Wilkins 2015) — Hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with intermediate-risk localised prostate cancer: 2-year patient-reported outcomes of the randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 CHHiP trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(16):1605–1616 Source
  3. POP-RT (toxicity) — Late toxicity and quality of life with prostate only or whole pelvic radiation therapy in high risk prostate cancer (POP-RT): A randomised trial. Radiother Oncol. 2020;145:71–80 Source
  4. ENZARAD protocol — ENZARAD (ANZUP 1303): a randomised phase 3 trial of enzalutamide in androgen deprivation therapy with radiation therapy for high risk, clinically localised, prostate cancer. ENZARAD / ANZUP 1303 trial protocol Source
  5. QUANTEC — QUANTEC — Quantitative Analyses of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(3 Suppl):S1–S160 Source
  6. NCCN Anal Cancer v2.2022 — NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology — Anal Cancer, Version 2.2022. NCCN Guidelines, Anal Cancer, Version 2.2022 Source
  7. RTOG 0126 — RTOG 0126: A Phase III Randomized Study of High Dose 3D-CRT/IMRT Versus Standard Dose 3D-CRT/IMRT in Patients Treated for Localized Prostate Cancer. Protocol, RTOG 0126 Source

Values quoted from eviQ 3657 (last reviewed 7 November 2024; review due 31 December 2026) and CORSAIR, checked by DoseLab on 2026-09-23. Verify against your protocol, institutional policy and physician directive before clinical use.

Search all prostate constraints in the Constraint Finder →

Protocols & Literature

All prostate literature →